<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/css/rss20.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.5.1" -->
<rss xmlns:pheedo="http://www.pheedo.com/namespace/pheedo" version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TwinForce™ Technology Delivers Fuel Economy</title>
	<link>http://autoshows.ford.com/127/2007/01/18/twinforce%e2%84%a2-technology-delivers-fuel-economy/?cmp=rss|comments|127|pheedo</link>
	<description>Ford Motor Company Global Auto Shows</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title><![CDATA[By: Grant]]></title>
		<link>http://www.pheedo.com/click.phdo?i=0b2235cd36f626d980bc58692da7200a</link>
<pheedo:origLink>http://autoshows.ford.com/127/2007/01/18/twinforce%e2%84%a2-technology-delivers-fuel-economy/?cmp=rss|comments|127|pheedo</pheedo:origLink>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://autoshows.ford.com/127/2007/01/18/twinforce%e2%84%a2-technology-delivers-fuel-economy/?cmp=rss|comments|127|pheedo#100197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a former Ford employee in product development and now a home builder, this TwinForce idea in the 4 cylinder engine would be great in the Ranger pickups.  I sold my F350 diesel due to fuel costs, and didn't really need that much truck anyway.  I would think Ford could sell a lot of TwinForce-equiped Rangers to contractors and fleets.<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=0b2235cd36f626d980bc58692da7200a" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=0b2235cd36f626d980bc58692da7200a" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- FORD_LA_Auto_Show_Comment_ID(100197) Parent_ID(000000) --><p>As a former Ford employee in product development and now a home builder, this TwinForce idea in the 4 cylinder engine would be great in the Ranger pickups.  I sold my F350 diesel due to fuel costs, and didn&#8217;t really need that much truck anyway.  I would think Ford could sell a lot of TwinForce-equiped Rangers to contractors and fleets.</p>
<br style="clear: both;"/>
  <img alt="" style="border: 0; height:1px; width:1px;" border="0" src="http://www.pheedo.com/img.phdo?i=0b2235cd36f626d980bc58692da7200a" height="1" width="1"/>
<img src="http://www.pheedo.com/feeds/tracker.php?i=0b2235cd36f626d980bc58692da7200a" style="display: none;" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[By: Paul]]></title>
		<link>http://autoshows.ford.com/127/2007/01/18/twinforce%e2%84%a2-technology-delivers-fuel-economy/?cmp=rss|comments|127|pheedo</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2007 00:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autoshows.ford.com/127/2007/01/18/twinforce%e2%84%a2-technology-delivers-fuel-economy/?cmp=rss|comments|127|pheedo#8151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I hope when the next generation Australian Ford Falcon gets a Duratec V6 the XR6 turbo will get the TwinForce treatment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- FORD_LA_Auto_Show_Comment_ID(008151) Parent_ID(000000) --><p> I hope when the next generation Australian Ford Falcon gets a Duratec V6 the XR6 turbo will get the TwinForce treatment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[By: Chris Haywood]]></title>
		<link>http://autoshows.ford.com/127/2007/01/18/twinforce%e2%84%a2-technology-delivers-fuel-economy/?cmp=rss|comments|127|pheedo</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Haywood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 10:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autoshows.ford.com/127/2007/01/18/twinforce%e2%84%a2-technology-delivers-fuel-economy/?cmp=rss|comments|127|pheedo#3669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great idea! I have always been a fan of turbocharging. I have owned two Thunderbird Turbo Coupes with the 2.3L Turbocharged/Intercooled/EFI/SOHC inline-4 engine and 5-speed transmission, a 1987 and a 1988. Both were wonderful cars. Plenty of power and great fuel economy. Turbocharging has always been what most would call "free" horsepower. Meaning that there are no parasitic losses due to the turbocharger since it runs on exhaust gasses. A supercharger, on the other hand, uses engine power to drive the impellers to make more power, therefore it is not free. If I had anything to do with it, Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury would jump into this technology with both feet and run with it. Lincoln needs all the help it can get right now and so does Ford and Mercury. That means more REAR-WHEEL-DRIVE cars and more engines with piles of horsepower so they can compete with the other auto makers. Please run with this program.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- FORD_LA_Auto_Show_Comment_ID(003669) Parent_ID(000000) --><p>This is a great idea! I have always been a fan of turbocharging. I have owned two Thunderbird Turbo Coupes with the 2.3L Turbocharged/Intercooled/EFI/SOHC inline-4 engine and 5-speed transmission, a 1987 and a 1988. Both were wonderful cars. Plenty of power and great fuel economy. Turbocharging has always been what most would call &#8220;free&#8221; horsepower. Meaning that there are no parasitic losses due to the turbocharger since it runs on exhaust gasses. A supercharger, on the other hand, uses engine power to drive the impellers to make more power, therefore it is not free. If I had anything to do with it, Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury would jump into this technology with both feet and run with it. Lincoln needs all the help it can get right now and so does Ford and Mercury. That means more REAR-WHEEL-DRIVE cars and more engines with piles of horsepower so they can compete with the other auto makers. Please run with this program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[By: Pete]]></title>
		<link>http://autoshows.ford.com/127/2007/01/18/twinforce%e2%84%a2-technology-delivers-fuel-economy/?cmp=rss|comments|127|pheedo</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autoshows.ford.com/127/2007/01/18/twinforce%e2%84%a2-technology-delivers-fuel-economy/?cmp=rss|comments|127|pheedo#3208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an excellent idea. My '06 GTI has the VW/Audi 2 litre direct injection turbo 4, and it's a fabulous, efficient design. Lots of power (more than the stated 200 bhp) and I get 32-34 mpg on the highway. 
Ford, even BMW, long a leader in engine design, is turning to turbocharging. DO NOT ABANDON THIS LINE OF THINKING.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- FORD_LA_Auto_Show_Comment_ID(003208) Parent_ID(000000) --><p>This is an excellent idea. My &#8216;06 GTI has the VW/Audi 2 litre direct injection turbo 4, and it&#8217;s a fabulous, efficient design. Lots of power (more than the stated 200 bhp) and I get 32-34 mpg on the highway.<br />
Ford, even BMW, long a leader in engine design, is turning to turbocharging. DO NOT ABANDON THIS LINE OF THINKING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[By: greg]]></title>
		<link>http://autoshows.ford.com/127/2007/01/18/twinforce%e2%84%a2-technology-delivers-fuel-economy/?cmp=rss|comments|127|pheedo</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://autoshows.ford.com/127/2007/01/18/twinforce%e2%84%a2-technology-delivers-fuel-economy/?cmp=rss|comments|127|pheedo#2358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey this is so sweet when  does it come out\]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- FORD_LA_Auto_Show_Comment_ID(002358) Parent_ID(000000) --><p>hey this is so sweet when  does it come out\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
